The Forester has standard Whiplash-Reducing Front Seats, which use a specially designed seat to protect the driver and front passenger from whiplash. During a rear-end collision, the Whiplash-Reducing Front Seats system allows the backrest to travel backwards to cushion the occupants and the headrests move forward to prevent neck and spine injuries. The HR-V doesn’t offer a whiplash protection system.
In a Vehicle-to-Vehicle Frontal Crash Prevention 2.0 test conducted by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), the Subaru Forester achieved a “Good” rating - the highest possible - in forward collision warning and automatic braking systems, outperforming the Honda HR-V which scored only an “Acceptable” in these critical safety features.
To provide maximum traction and stability on all roads, All-Wheel Drive is standard on the Forester. But it costs extra on the HR-V.
The Forester Touring has a standard 360-Degree Surround View Monitor to allow the driver to see objects all around the vehicle on a screen. The HR-V only offers a rear monitor and front and rear parking sensors that beep or flash a light. That doesn’t help with obstacles to the sides.
Both the Forester and the HR-V have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, driver knee airbags, side-impact head airbags, front and rear seatbelt pretensioners, height adjustable front shoulder belts, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, lane departure warning systems, rearview cameras, available blind spot warning systems, rear cross-path warning and driver alert monitors.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does 35 MPH front crash tests on new vehicles. In this test, results indicate that the Subaru Forester is safer than the Honda HR-V:
|
Forester |
HR-V |
|
Driver |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
Neck Injury Risk |
24.4% |
30.8% |
Leg Forces (l/r) |
276/274 lbs. |
279/312 lbs. |
|
Passenger |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
4 Stars |
HIC |
211 |
278 |
Chest Compression |
.6 inches |
.6 inches |
Neck Injury Risk |
33.1% |
41.3% |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does side impact tests on new vehicles. In this test, which crashes the vehicle into a flat barrier at 38.5 MPH and into a post at 20 MPH, results indicate that the Subaru Forester is safer than the Honda HR-V:
|
Forester |
HR-V |
|
Front Seat |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
HIC |
56 |
87 |
Chest Movement |
.4 inches |
.7 inches |
Abdominal Force |
84 lbs. |
118 lbs. |
Hip Force |
349 lbs. |
418 lbs. |
|
Rear Seat |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
Spine Acceleration |
58 G’s |
61 G’s |
Hip Force |
640 lbs. |
910 lbs. |
|
Into Pole |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
HIC |
167 |
292 |
Spine Acceleration |
34 G’s |
42 G’s |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
Side impacts caused 23% of all road fatalities in 2018, down from 29% in 2003, when the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety introduced its side barrier test. In order to continue improving vehicle safety, the IIHS has started using a more severe side impact test: 37 MPH (up from 31 MPH), with a 4180-pound barrier (up from 3300 pounds). The results of this newly developed test demonstrates that the Subaru Forester is safer than the HR-V:
|
Forester |
HR-V |
Overall Evaluation |
GOOD |
GOOD |
|
Driver Injury Measures |
|
Head/Neck |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Head Injury Criterion |
103 |
139 |
Neck Tension |
201 lbs. |
223 lbs. |
Torso |
GOOD |
ACCEPTABLE |
Torso Max Deflection |
1.02 in |
1.3 in |
Torso Deflection Rate |
6 MPH |
7 MPH |
Pelvis |
GOOD |
ACCEPTABLE |
Pelvis Force |
892 lbs. |
937 lbs. |
Head Protection |
GOOD |
GOOD |
|
Passenger Injury Measures |
|
Head/Neck |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Neck Compression |
134 lbs. |
156 lbs. |
Torso |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Torso Max Deflection |
1.34 in |
1.46 in |
Pelvis |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Pelvis Force |
580 lbs. |
625 lbs. |
Head Protection |
GOOD |
GOOD |